(Natural News) Last month, Great Game India published a report about a two-year-old child who died after receiving a Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” from Pfizer. The case was reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), only to later be removed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Since only children between the ages of five and 11 are “authorized” to receive a Chinese Virus injection from Pfizer, Great Game India wanted to know why a two-year-old baby received it, calling on the CDC to fully investigate the situation. Instead, the CDC ignored the request and proceeded to remove the VAERS entry without explanation.
The two-year-old girl in question passed almost immediately after receiving her second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA (messenger RNA) injection, instantly developing severe reactions. She ended up dead within just a few days.
News started to spread and many were calling on the CDC to take action, seeing as how it is supposed to act in the best interests of public health. Since the CDC is actually a private corporation that works for Big Pharma, however, nothing was done and the girl’s death was quickly scrubbed from the government database.
The fake news media quickly swooped in to defend Big Pharma as well, falsely claiming that children under the age of five were not receiving Wuhan Flu shots at the time. Three “fact checkers” from Newsweek all made this patently false claim.
“Vaccine trials for babies as young as six months are underway at least since March,” reported Great Game India about the facts.
CDC says removal of young girl’s death entry was an oopsie
More than 10,000 babies as young as six months old, in fact, were receiving mRNA injections from Pfizer and Moderna as far back as mid-March, which is right around the time the two-year-old girl died from her injection.
Pfizer itself admits this to be true, which makes the Newsweek “fact check” laughable. In what way and using what evidence did these “fact checkers” come to the conclusion that babies were not yet receiving Pfizer injections as of mid-March, we would like to know?
Author
“Since the CDC is actually a private corporation that works for Big Pharma”
Really?! Thought the CDC was a public government agency…
No doubt corruption is part of the equation, but having the facts straight helps keep people from completely writing off our concerns.
Thanks for catching that Jason. I think the confusion might be due to the fact that the CDC Foundation is a private non-profit organization and not a government agency, but it is different from the CDC. Here’s a link for more info:
https://www.cdcfoundation.org/public-private-partnership-guidelines
That’s what I found after a quick search as well. Too easy to jump to conclusions these days!!
Again, this proves that the jab is not the mark of the beast, since little children do not go to hell. However, if the mark of the beast were a basement, the jab is like taking five steps down.
that’s what it says “small”
16
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: