{"id":221764,"date":"2022-02-13T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-02-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/?p=221764"},"modified":"2022-02-15T12:24:15","modified_gmt":"2022-02-15T17:24:15","slug":"the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/","title":{"rendered":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg"},"content":{"rendered":"<hr \/>\n<h3 id=\"expanderHead\" data-jsid=\"expanderHead\">STORY AT-A-GLANCE<\/h3>\n<div id=\"expanderContent\" data-jsid=\"expanderContent\">\n<ul>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_0\">The U.K. Ministry of Defense and the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning Human stress that human augmentation needs to be a key area of focus to win future wars<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_1\">Human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite eventually using their augmented \u201csuper-human\u201d status as justification to rule everyone else<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_2\">The goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution \u2014 introduced and pushed by the World Economic Forum \u2014 is transhumanism, the merging of man with machine<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_3\">Human augmentation can directly affect behavior, either positively or to the detriment of that person<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_4\">In the transhumanist view, the human body is a \u201cplatform\u201d that can be augmented in myriad ways, physically, psychologically and socially<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p>A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.technocracy.news\/mercola-on-convergence-transhumanism-and-the-great-reset\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">dystopian cybernetics future<\/a> that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward.<\/p>\n<p>The report, \u201cHuman Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\u201d<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn1\" data-hash=\"#ednref1\">1<\/span><\/sup> reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars.<\/p>\n<p>But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \u201csuper-humans.\u201d It\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201c&#8230; the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\u201d<\/em> the report states. <em>\u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur &#8230; Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>Changing What It Means To Be Human<\/h2>\n<p>As noted in the report, \u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to &#8230; change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn2\" data-hash=\"#ednref2\">2<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.<\/p>\n<p>Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \u201chumans are now hackable animals.\u201d<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn3\" data-hash=\"#ednref3\">3<\/span><\/sup> As noted in the featured report:<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn4\" data-hash=\"#ednref4\">4<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Key words I\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\u2019s own detriment.<\/p>\n<p>Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.<\/p>\n<p>Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-rwd\">\n<figure class=\"op-interactive aspect-ratio\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Dr. Charles Morgan on Psycho-Neurobiology and War\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/cTtIPBPSv0U?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<h2>The Human Platform<\/h2>\n<p>On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight<\/li>\n<li>Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance<\/li>\n<li>Social performance \u2014 \u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\u201d \u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \u201chuman platform,\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \u2018see\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs?<\/p>\n<p>As for ethics, the paper stresses that \u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\u201d There may even be \u201cmoral obligations\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \u201cpromote well-being\u201d or protect a population from a \u201cnovel threat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, the paper notes that \u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress.<\/p>\n<h2>The Challenge of Unintended Consequences<\/h2>\n<p>Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>In a war-fighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>Lab-Grown Designer Babies<\/h2>\n<p>As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn5\" data-hash=\"#ednref5\">5<\/span><\/sup> which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn6\" data-hash=\"#ednref6\">6<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn7\" data-hash=\"#ednref7\">7<\/span><\/sup> on human embryonic experimentation.<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn8\" data-hash=\"#ednref8\">8<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out.<\/p>\n<p>Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn9\" data-hash=\"#ednref9\">9<\/span><\/sup> \u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn10\" data-hash=\"#ednref10\">10<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn11\" data-hash=\"#ednref11\">11<\/span><\/sup> questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering.<\/p>\n<h2>Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs?<\/h2>\n<p>Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn12\" data-hash=\"#ednref12\">12<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule.<\/p>\n<p>The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human?<\/p>\n<p>How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure.<\/p>\n<h2>Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism<\/h2>\n<p>Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\u201d writes:<sup style=\"font-size: 10px;\"><span id=\"edn13\" data-hash=\"#ednref13\">13<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>We simply can\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Technology ethics can\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1199505\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/>Sources and References<\/h2>\n<div id=\"contentrefsources\" class=\"contentrefsources\" data-jsid=\"sourcesReferences\">\n<div id=\"bcr_divReferences\" class=\"references\">\n<ul id=\"footnote-references2\">\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref1\" data-hash=\"#edn1\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">1,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref4\" data-hash=\"#edn4\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">4<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/986301\/Human_Augmentation_SIP_access2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Human Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project May 2021<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref2\" data-hash=\"#edn2\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">2<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/about\/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">WEF The Fourth Industrial Revolution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref3\" data-hash=\"#edn3\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">3<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/videos\/world\/2019\/11\/26\/yuval-noah-harari-interview-anderson-vpx.cnn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">CNN November 26, 2019<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref5\" data-hash=\"#edn5\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">5,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref6\" data-hash=\"#edn6\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">6<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/futurism.com\/neoscope\/chinese-artificial-womb-robot-nanny\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Futurism February 1, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref7\" data-hash=\"#edn7\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">7<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.isscr.org\/policy\/guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">ISSCR Guidelines<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref8\" data-hash=\"#edn8\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">8<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/2021\/05\/26\/scientific-panel-loosens-14-day-rule-limiting-how-long-human-embryos-can-be-grown-in-lab\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">STAT News May 26, 2021<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref9\" data-hash=\"#edn9\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">9<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.technologyreview.com\/2018\/11\/25\/138962\/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Technology Review November 25, 2018<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref10\" data-hash=\"#edn10\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">10<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/ap-top-news-international-news-ca-state-wire-genetic-frontiers-health-4997bb7aa36c45449b488e19ac83e86d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">AP News November 26, 2018<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref11\" data-hash=\"#edn11\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">11<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-019-01739-w\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Nature June 3, 2019<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref12\" data-hash=\"#edn12\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">12<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/human-monkey-hybrid-embryo-created-joint-chinaus-scientist-team-1584232\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Newsweek April 16, 2021<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref13\" data-hash=\"#edn13\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">13<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/unherd.com\/2022\/01\/how-covid-stole-our-privacy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Unherd January 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>Originally published by <a href=\"http:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/02\/14\/human-augmentation.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Mercola.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward. <\/p>\n<p>The report, \u201cHuman Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\u201d1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars.<\/p>\n<p>But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \u201csuper-humans.\u201d It\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c&#8230; the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\u201d the report states. \u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us.<\/p>\n<p>Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur &#8230; Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities.<\/p>\n<p>Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Changing What It Means To Be Human<\/p>\n<p>As noted in the report, \u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to &#8230; change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2<\/p>\n<p>WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.<\/p>\n<p>Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \u201chumans are now hackable animals.\u201d3 As noted in the featured report:4<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines.<\/p>\n<p>Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective.<\/p>\n<p>Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Key words I\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\u2019s own detriment.<\/p>\n<p>Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.<\/p>\n<p>Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.<\/p>\n<p>The Human Platform<\/p>\n<p>On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example:<\/p>\n<p> Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight<br \/>\n Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance<br \/>\n Social performance \u2014 \u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\u201d \u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here<\/p>\n<p>They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \u201chuman platform,\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \u2018see\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields.<\/p>\n<p>More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs?<\/p>\n<p>As for ethics, the paper stresses that \u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\u201d There may even be \u201cmoral obligations\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \u201cpromote well-being\u201d or protect a population from a \u201cnovel threat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, the paper notes that \u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress.<\/p>\n<p>The Challenge of Unintended Consequences<\/p>\n<p>Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion.<\/p>\n<p>In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn.<\/p>\n<p>The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lab-Grown Designer Babies<\/p>\n<p>As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8<\/p>\n<p>Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out.<\/p>\n<p>Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 \u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10<\/p>\n<p>In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering.<\/p>\n<p>Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs?<\/p>\n<p>Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12<\/p>\n<p>The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule.<\/p>\n<p>The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human?<\/p>\n<p>How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure.<\/p>\n<p>Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\u201d writes:13<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion.<\/p>\n<p>We simply can\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves.<\/p>\n<p>The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy.<\/p>\n<p>Technology ethics can\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":687,"featured_media":168525,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":"","_ppma_block_editor_authors":""},"categories":[356],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[657],"class_list":["post-221764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-transhumanism","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.2.1 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward. The report, \u201cHuman Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\u201d1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars. But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \u201csuper-humans.\u201d It\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction. \u201c... the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\u201d the report states. \u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us. Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human ... Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur ... Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities. Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life ... When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\u201d Changing What It Means To Be Human As noted in the report, \u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to ... change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2 WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not. Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \u201chumans are now hackable animals.\u201d3 As noted in the featured report:4 \u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines. Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective. Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\u201d Key words I\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\u2019s own detriment. Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training. Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver. The Human Platform On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example: Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance Social performance \u2014 \u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\u201d \u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \u201chuman platform,\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report: \u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \u2018see\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields. More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\u201d They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs? As for ethics, the paper stresses that \u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\u201d There may even be \u201cmoral obligations\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \u201cpromote well-being\u201d or protect a population from a \u201cnovel threat.\u201d Interestingly, the paper notes that \u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress. The Challenge of Unintended Consequences Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report: \u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion. In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn. The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\u201d Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors: \u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago. Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\u201d Lab-Grown Designer Babies As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6 \u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\u201d As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8 Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out. Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 \u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\u201d The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10 In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering. Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs? Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12 The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule. The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human? How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure. Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\u201d writes:13 \u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion. We simply can\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend ... Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves. The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy. Technology ethics can\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\u201d\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dr Joseph Mercola\"\/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.2.1\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#article\",\"name\":\"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg | Z3 News\",\"headline\":\"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/author\\\/mercola\\\/#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500},\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-13T19:00:00-05:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-15T12:24:15-05:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Transhumanism, Dr Joseph Mercola\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"News\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Jesuit Agendas\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Jesuit Agendas\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/transhumanism\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Transhumanism\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"News\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/transhumanism\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Transhumanism\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/transhumanism\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Jesuit Agendas\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":5,\"name\":\"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/category\\\/news\\\/jesuit-agendas\\\/transhumanism\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Transhumanism\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Z3 News\",\"description\":\"Revealing Mystery Babylon\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/cropped-Z3_tagline.jpeg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#organizationLogo\",\"width\":760,\"height\":180},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#organizationLogo\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/author\\\/mercola\\\/#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/author\\\/mercola\\\/\",\"name\":\"Dr Joseph Mercola\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg | Z3 News\",\"description\":\"A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward. The report, \\u201cHuman Augmentation \\u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\\u201d1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars. But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \\u201csuper-humans.\\u201d It\\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction. \\u201c... the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\\u201d the report states. \\u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us. Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human ... Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur ... Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities. Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life ... When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\\u201d Changing What It Means To Be Human As noted in the report, \\u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to ... change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2 WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not. Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \\u201chumans are now hackable animals.\\u201d3 As noted in the featured report:4 \\u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines. Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective. Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\\u201d Key words I\\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \\u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\\u2019s own detriment. Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training. Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver. The Human Platform On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example: Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance Social performance \\u2014 \\u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\\u201d \\u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \\u201chuman platform,\\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report: \\u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \\u2018see\\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields. More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\\u201d They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs? As for ethics, the paper stresses that \\u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\\u201d There may even be \\u201cmoral obligations\\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \\u201cpromote well-being\\u201d or protect a population from a \\u201cnovel threat.\\u201d Interestingly, the paper notes that \\u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress. The Challenge of Unintended Consequences Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report: \\u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion. In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn. The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\\u201d Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors: \\u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago. Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\\u201d Lab-Grown Designer Babies As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6 \\u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\\u201d As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \\u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8 Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out. Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 \\u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\\u201d The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \\u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10 In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering. Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs? Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12 The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \\u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule. The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human? How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure. Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \\u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\\u201d writes:13 \\u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion. We simply can\\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend ... Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves. The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy. Technology ethics can\\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\\u201d\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/author\\\/mercola\\\/#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/author\\\/mercola\\\/#author\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#mainImage\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\\\/#mainImage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-13T19:00:00-05:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-15T12:24:15-05:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/\",\"name\":\"Z3 News\",\"description\":\"Revealing Mystery Babylon\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/z3news.com\\\/w\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg | Z3 News","description":"A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward. The report, \u201cHuman Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\u201d1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars. But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \u201csuper-humans.\u201d It\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction. \u201c... the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\u201d the report states. \u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us. Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human ... Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur ... Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities. Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life ... When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\u201d Changing What It Means To Be Human As noted in the report, \u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to ... change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2 WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not. Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \u201chumans are now hackable animals.\u201d3 As noted in the featured report:4 \u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines. Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective. Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\u201d Key words I\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\u2019s own detriment. Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training. Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver. The Human Platform On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example: Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance Social performance \u2014 \u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\u201d \u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \u201chuman platform,\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report: \u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \u2018see\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields. More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\u201d They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs? As for ethics, the paper stresses that \u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\u201d There may even be \u201cmoral obligations\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \u201cpromote well-being\u201d or protect a population from a \u201cnovel threat.\u201d Interestingly, the paper notes that \u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress. The Challenge of Unintended Consequences Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report: \u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion. In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn. The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\u201d Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors: \u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago. Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\u201d Lab-Grown Designer Babies As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6 \u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\u201d As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8 Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out. Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 \u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\u201d The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10 In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering. Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs? Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12 The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule. The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human? How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure. Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\u201d writes:13 \u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion. We simply can\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend ... Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves. The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy. Technology ethics can\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\u201d","canonical_url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#article","name":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg | Z3 News","headline":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/author\/mercola\/#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#organization"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg","width":500,"height":500},"datePublished":"2022-02-13T19:00:00-05:00","dateModified":"2022-02-15T12:24:15-05:00","inLanguage":"en-US","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#webpage"},"articleSection":"Transhumanism, Dr Joseph Mercola"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/#listItem","name":"News"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"News","item":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/#listItem","name":"Jesuit Agendas"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"Jesuit Agendas","item":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/#listItem","name":"Transhumanism"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/#listItem","name":"News"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/#listItem","position":4,"name":"Transhumanism","item":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#listItem","name":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/#listItem","name":"Jesuit Agendas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#listItem","position":5,"name":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/#listItem","name":"Transhumanism"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#organization","name":"Z3 News","description":"Revealing Mystery Babylon","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/cropped-Z3_tagline.jpeg","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#organizationLogo","width":760,"height":180},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#organizationLogo"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/author\/mercola\/#author","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/author\/mercola\/","name":"Dr Joseph Mercola"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/","name":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg | Z3 News","description":"A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward. The report, \u201cHuman Augmentation \u2014 The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,\u201d1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars. But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It\u2019s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented \u201csuper-humans.\u201d It\u2019s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction. \u201c... the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,\u201d the report states. \u201cWe must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us. Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human ... Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur ... Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities. Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life ... When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.\u201d Changing What It Means To Be Human As noted in the report, \u201cHuman augmentation has the potential to ... change the meaning of what it means to be a human.\u201d This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2 WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF\u2019s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it\u2019s all about transhumanism. It\u2019s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not. Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, \u201chumans are now hackable animals.\u201d3 As noted in the featured report:4 \u201cHuman augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines. Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective. Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.\u201d Key words I\u2019d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can \u201cdirectly enhance behavior.\u201d Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone\u2019s behavior. And if you can change a person\u2019s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person\u2019s own detriment. Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training. Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver. The Human Platform On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example: Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance Social performance \u2014 \u201cthe ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team\u201d \u2014 can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the \u201chuman platform,\u201d including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report: \u201cThe senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to \u2018see\u2019 through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields. More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.\u201d They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs? As for ethics, the paper stresses that \u201cwe cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.\u201d There may even be \u201cmoral obligations\u201d to augment people, they say, such as when it would \u201cpromote well-being\u201d or protect a population from a \u201cnovel threat.\u201d Interestingly, the paper notes that \u201cIt could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.\u201d This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it\u2019s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress. The Challenge of Unintended Consequences Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report: \u201cThe relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person\u2019s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion. In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn. The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.\u201d Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors: \u201cDevices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago. Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.\u201d Lab-Grown Designer Babies As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6 \u201cThe system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.\u201d As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as \u201cexperimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.\u201d However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8 Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there\u2019s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out. Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 \u201cA daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.\u201d The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies \u201cresistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.\u201d The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10 In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering. Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs? Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12 The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days \u2014 and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule. The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human? How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn\u2019t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what\u2019s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It\u2019s a slippery slope, for sure. Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we\u2019re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of \u201cBig Data: Does Size Matter?\u201d writes:13 \u201cAs the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there\u2019s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion. We simply can\u2019t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend ... Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves. The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy. Technology ethics can\u2019t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.\u201d","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/author\/mercola\/#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/author\/mercola\/#author"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#mainImage","width":500,"height":500},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/#mainImage"},"datePublished":"2022-02-13T19:00:00-05:00","dateModified":"2022-02-15T12:24:15-05:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#website","url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/","name":"Z3 News","description":"Revealing Mystery Babylon","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/#organization"}}]}},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"221764","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":[],"keyphrases":{"focus":[],"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":[],"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":{"id":"aioseo-article-634e1b0aaef9b","slug":"article","graphName":"Article","label":"Article","properties":{"type":"BlogPosting","name":"#post_title","headline":"#post_title","description":"#post_excerpt","image":"","keywords":"","author":{"name":"#author_name","url":"#author_url"},"dates":{"include":true,"datePublished":"","dateModified":""}}},"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":"{\"article\":{\"articleType\":\"BlogPosting\"},\"course\":{\"name\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"provider\":\"\"},\"faq\":{\"pages\":[]},\"product\":{\"reviews\":[]},\"recipe\":{\"ingredients\":[],\"instructions\":[],\"keywords\":[]},\"software\":{\"reviews\":[],\"operatingSystems\":[]},\"webPage\":{\"webPageType\":\"WebPage\"}}","pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":null,"created":"2022-02-14 15:56:51","updated":"2025-07-16 14:28:57","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/\" title=\"News\">News<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/\" title=\"Jesuit Agendas\">Jesuit Agendas<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/\" title=\"Transhumanism\">Transhumanism<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tThe Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/"},{"label":"News","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/"},{"label":"Jesuit Agendas","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/"},{"label":"Transhumanism","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/category\/news\/jesuit-agendas\/transhumanism\/"},{"label":"The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg","link":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/the-plan-to-turn-you-into-a-genetically-edited-human-cyborg\/"}],"authors":[{"term_id":657,"user_id":687,"is_guest":0,"slug":"mercola","display_name":"Dr Joseph Mercola","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg","url2x":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/C43D8472-9106-40FB-B345-054F888B9355.jpeg"},"author_category":"","user_url":"https:\/\/mercola.com","last_name":"Mercola","first_name":"Dr Joseph","job_title":"","description":"Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health."}],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/687"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221764\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/168525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221764"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/z3news.com\/w\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=221764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}