My compliments to members of the \u201cCovid Cult.\u201d Look at what they have been able to accomplish by instilling such universal panic over a common respiratory virus (that appears to have the same overall mortality risk as influenza but less than influenza in young people). This was especially amazing since the virus had already been well disseminated throughout the world without revealing anything to be panicked about even before their run.<\/p>\n
They were able to tap into the deep well of totalitarian inclinations of \u201cpoliticians\u201d everywhere and at the same time so clearly demonstrated how they can be led around by the nose. These totalitarians now command the police and armies and they discard and ignore the very laws that founded their countries\/states only to introduce personal mandates.<\/p>\n
Hence, they were able to create whole prison nations (Australia and New Zealand being the most notable, but there are many others) and semi-tyrannical despotisms (U.K., Ireland, France, Spain, Italy, and many states as well as the Federal Government in the US, Canada, and others) where none existed before.<\/p>\n
They were able to enlist, very effectively, most major media in most countries as sources of propaganda and brainwashing, and they have profited from it.<\/p>\n
They were able to enlist technology companies as sources of censorship and mind control, and they have profited from it.<\/p>\n
They were able to enlist corporations to walk lockstep with you, and they have profited from it.<\/p>\n
They were able to enlist \u201cPublic Health Agencies\u201d (or maybe they are simply a part of the Cult and needed no enlisting?), and they also have profited from it.<\/p>\n
They were able to frighten people into believing that some porous covering on their face could actually stop a virus. Or that by standing that magical distance of six feet would prevent the virus from making it to them. Or that by splashing some alcohol on their hands would protect them. Or by erecting plexiglass between merchant and customer, the virus would be confounded. Or that by staying home and hiding, they would somehow be saved along with the rest of the planet.<\/p>\n
Likewise, they were able to convince these people that somehow, suddenly now, everyone that they knew or did not know posed a risk to them and should be avoided at all costs. They were also able to convince them that performing any act of humanity, such as enjoying music, attending meetings, socializing, enjoying specially prepared foods, going to schools, etc. would lead to the destruction of the human race.<\/p>\n
They were well funded from both private foundations as well as government sources.<\/p>\n
They were able to pave the way for vaccine companies to really profit. I have never heard of a company making a profit on a clinical trial candidate, yet Pfizer reported over $30 billion earnings from their vaccine even though it was not approved; it was experimental. An approved drug is considered a big success if it earns $1 billion in the first year after approval. Kudos to helping establish a completely new record unmatched in pharmaceutical history.<\/p>\n
Of course, their success rate is not 100%; there have been holdouts and escapees; countries like Sweden (and others), and states like South Dakota and Florida (and others). But, like any good Cult, they continue to send minions after them to try and castigate them. I do not think their goal is to bring these renegades back into the fold but it is to serve as a warning to others that may want to try to escape. Try to go against us and we will go after you. That is a typical Cult reaction, so I am not surprised.<\/p>\n
But, as clever as they have been, none of it would have been possible if not for a public that was ripe to be had. Like any successful \u201cCon,\u201d the audience first has to be conditioned. Here, you may have had some luck because the \u201cconditioning\u201d has been going on for some time. You had it easy.<\/p>\n
In 1996, Dr. Sagan bemoaned the ignorance of society in regards to science and technology during an interview with Charlie Rose<\/a>, just about six months before his death in December. Sagan understood that such ignorance could lead to easy manipulation by the people in power. At about the three and a half minute mark he said, \u201cSooner or later it will blow up in our faces.\u201d Then Sagan predicted an explosion would occur.<\/p>\n He makes another point if you listen on: \u201cScience\u201d is not about what makes us feel good. I will return to this.<\/p>\n The \u201cTechnology Paradox\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n There exists what I call the \u201cTechnology Paradox\u201d (I am not sure if someone has previously stated this in this way so my apologies if so). As technology improves and controls more aspects of human existence, the human being becomes lazier and weakens physically, intellectually, socially, and emotionally. Incidentally, the \u201cTechnologists and Technocrats\u201d are not exempt from this de-evolution.<\/p>\n It actually benefits Technocrats if the words \u201cScience\u201d and \u201cTechnology\u201d are used together, even interchangeably. Most people do not realize that Science and Technology are not the same things and are not seeking the same goals. Technocrats seem like parasites riding on the back of science. Here is why.<\/p>\n The goal of \u201cScience\u201d is about understanding and a process to seek the truth. In other words,\u201cScience\u201d is a methodology (continually evolving mostly by trial and error) and as noted by Dr. Sagan, is not intended to make us feel good \u2013 it is what it is. It does not give immediate answers. But, it functions best when there is open debate and disagreement.<\/p>\n The goal of \u201cTechnology\u201d \u2013 what used to be called \u201cthe practical arts\u201d \u2013is making human existence easier. So, at least part, if not most, of the goal of \u201cTechnology\u201d is to make us \u201cfeel good.\u201d In this respect, technology is oftentimes at odds with science. But in trying to make life easier and make us feel good, addiction to technology can result, which now makes people more at the mercy of those who control the technology. Yes, technology can become a dependency.<\/p>\n Technology has a basis in science and science makes use of technology so there is an interdependency. Technology can improve efficiency, reduce waste, speed up performance, improve communication, etc. It also can transfer work load, both physical AND mental, from human to machines. Sometimes, these are good things but left unchecked, the result can be disastrous.<\/p>\n The Covid Cult has utilized technology very effectively in attacking, or maybe commandeering, the term \u201cScience\u201d. The phrase \u201cFollow the Science\u201d has no relevant meaning in science but it does mean \u201cFollow the Modeling\u201d which is synonymous with \u201cFollow the Technology.\u201d Indeed, computer modeling has been confused with \u201cscience;\u201d it is not science. Yet, you were able to convince a public that knew no better that somehow science was connected.<\/p>\n When you declared \u201cwar\u201d on a \u201cvirus,\u201d war was also declared on \u201cscience.\u201d<\/p>\n True science has been banned and labeled \u201cmisinformation.\u201d True science has been forced into an underground enterprise. This had to be the goal of the Covid Cult because true science has always been an enemy of Cults. Check the history of the despots mentioned above and you will see what people were considered \u201cenemies.\u201d \u201cScience\u201d has been hijacked.<\/p>\n The Covid Cult has also been quite successful at following the work of researchers such as Solomon Asch, who in 1951 demonstrated the power of \u201cGroup Think\u201d and \u201cConformity to Delusion.\u201d<\/p>\n The Covid Cult has managed to take Dr. Asch\u2019s classic experiment, where an experiment was rigged to see if a person would follow Group Think and incorrectly identify a long line as a short line from a set of the two (look it up if you are interested in the details). The Cult has managed to convince many people that the long line is the short line, figuratively, with their narratives.<\/p>\n But, the Covid Cult has had a rather large advantage. Dr. Asch only used local social pressure in a laboratory setting on individuals in his experiment. The Covid Cult has gone far beyond the laboratory and have performed real social inquisitions of people who go against the narrative (usually on the \u201ctechnology\u201d platforms). This has included threatening jobs and livelihoods; loss of income, education, and social functions; loss of health maintenance and freedom of choice; loss of friends and family by creating imagined divisions; attempts to lay guilt, and more on those that did not go along with the narrative.<\/p>\n Further, the Asch experiments did not attempt to brainwash via repetition of memes and fear, censorship, or any of the myriad of actions that have emerged in 2020. People in the Asch experiments were not bombarded by signs everywhere saying \u201cFollow the Science\u201d or laced with cute symbols of \u201cmasks\u201d and \u201cdistancing\u201d and \u201ccleansers,\u201d etc.<\/p>\n Clearly, the Covid Cult has successfully used \u201cGroup Think\u201d to their advantage through repetitive messaging, censorship, and attacking science, using all of the weapons at their disposal as described above. The Covid Cult has been very effective at making people believe that the \u201clong line\u201d is the \u201cshort line.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr. Asch would also be amazed. Dr. Asch only exposed the tip of the iceberg; the Covid Cult has exposed all of the subsurface ice.<\/p>\n The Covid Cult has been adept at taking advantage of the dangerous binary thinking that now pervades society. People seem to now think only yes or no, for or against, \u201cIn this together\u201d or \u201cselfish,\u201d Democrat or Republican, Anti-Trump or deplorable, left or right, etc. Nonsensical options such as wear a mask or make someone die, or take a \u201cjab\u201d or keep everyone in their Gulag have also been at the forefront of the Covid Cult binary mentality.<\/p>\n Binary \u201cthinking\u201d is a trait of computers. Computers are based on \u201czero\u201d or \u201cone,\u201d \u201cgap\u201d or \u201cfill\u201d (the fundamental chemistry of semiconductors), \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno,\u201d etc. It is also the goal of \u201cbrainwashing.\u201d Abstract thought is not a part of the process and indeed logic and abstract reasoning are enemies of mind control.<\/p>\n The problem is that the world functions 99.99% of the time in the large gray zone. To think that the world functions in a binary mode is delusional. The more you try to force binary thinking into a world that is not binary, the more it is like trying to put a square peg in a round hole. You have to hammer it in with force (with brainwashing). There are many square pegs who are not ready to be pounded into the round hole. If someone wants to call me a \u201csquare peg,\u201d I consider it a compliment.<\/p>\n Some \u201cLong Lines\u201d that are still \u201cLong Lines\u201d<\/p>\n There are many things that cannot be \u201ccanceled,\u201d try as you will.<\/p>\n 1. Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI)<\/strong><\/p>\n Trying to \u201ccancel\u201d NAI by ignoring its existence is like trying to \u201ccancel\u201d ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun by ignoring its existence \u2013 both are a part of nature and they follow their own rules, not yours, not mine. The human immune system and NAI likely developed because viruses long preceded humans on the evolutionary timeline. In other words, we have been doing an intimate, symbiotic dance with viruses (including coronaviruses) as long as humans and our predecessors have roamed the planet. <\/a>If this dance was not mutually beneficial, both would have probably died out long ago, or maybe never even started.<\/p>\n NAI cannot be understood until it is clear what is meant by the term \u201cImmunity.\u201d Since part of the Covid Cult tactic is confusion, we need to throw a lifeline into the definition of immunity before it too is morphed into some grotesque concept by the Covid Cult.<\/p>\n Immunity does NOT mean \u201cfree of pathogens.\u201d Immunity relates to the level of disease that a person may experience due to the presence of a pathogen. Immunity refers to the relative strength of the immune system in response to a pathogen or rather, how much disease one might experience from a pathogen.<\/p>\n There is the pathogen and then there is the disease that results. For example, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) can lead to the disease called \u201cAIDS\u201d (after 40 years, still no vaccine). The Epstein-Barr virus can lead to the disease called mononucleosis. The influenza virus(es) can lead to the disease called \u201cthe flu.\u201d<\/p>\n There are people who have HIV but do not experience AIDS. There are people with Epstein-Barr but do not experience \u201cMono.\u201d There are people with influenza but do not experience \u201cthe flu.\u201d<\/p>\n If I say that I have some immunity to the flu, I am not saying that the virus can never enter my body. I am saying that my immune system works to prevent me from experiencing the disease that we call \u201cthe flu\u201d after I have been infected by the virus that we call influenza. But it is more than a yes or no (binary) answer.<\/p>\n Immunity can be thought of more as a sliding scale. There are some people with weak immune systems who experience diseases more severely, and people with very strong immune systems who have a weak experience with diseases. Most people have normal immune systems and experience most diseases mildly.<\/p>\n Clinically, it is easier to recognize the extremes (left side can include immune deficiency disorders and right side can include autoimmune disorders). However, the middle ground is more difficult and is very much dependent on the individual. Factors such as age, general health, genetics, diet and lifestyle, social habits, mental outlook, and more can all play a role as to where on the scale you fit.<\/p>\n Complicating matters is the fact that each and every pathogen\/antigen has its own \u201cimmunity scale\u201d for each and every person. For example, one person may rarely suffer from the flu (influenza virus), but may suffer a summer cold (rhinovirus) each year. Another person may rarely get that cold but will get put out of commission every year with the flu. My immunity scales probably are quite different from another person\u2019s scales. During my adult life, I have tended to experience the flu about once every seven years.<\/p>\n For six years, my immune system was able to prevent me from experiencing the disease but the virus was everywhere. Each time I did experience the flu, I had significant life stress occurring. Since stress weakens the immune system, I was more susceptible to disease. Look back at your own life and make your own evaluation. Can you find a link to stressful events in your life and when you became sick? What about timing?<\/p>\n Each immunity scale for each pathogen also has an expiration date (even those with lifetime immunity \u2013 we maybe just tend to die before the expiration date is finished) and that expiration date is different for each person. My expiration period seemed to be about 6-7 years for influenza. Another person might go 10 years and another only 3.<\/p>\n Clearly, immunity is not some binary consideration; it is largely gray zoned.<\/p>\n Your immune system has two major components, the first responders (immunoglobulins, interferons, etc.) and the specific antibodies, the heavy guns or \u201cterminators\u201d. With mild pathogens, the first responders tend to be enough. With Coronavirus, this seems to be relatively common.<\/p>\n My experience with Covid was mild so it would not surprise me if I did not actually produce specific antibodies to the virus. My first responders may have been sufficient to deal with it. But, another person may have had more disease and did produce antibodies. In the end, how do we compare? It is not really possible to say. If we both were to encounter the virus again, who has the better chance of less disease?<\/p>\n The immune system strengthens, generally, by exposure to pathogens\/antigens. That exposure leads to Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI). NAI is the most common and strongest form of immunity. But, even NAI is not always helpful.<\/p>\n The rabies virus is endemic in many animals in the wild but is deadly when encountered by domesticated animals or humans because our immune system is \u201cnaive\u201d to the virus which means that we have little or no capacity to fight the virus. There is no such thing as \u201cseasonal rabies.\u201d There are no \u201crabies\u201d waves in the population. You are fortunate if you can live your whole life without ever encountering the virus. Fortunately, the virus is a slow starter so vaccines are available to assist the immune system before the virus can take hold. This is an example where vaccines are extremely useful.<\/p>\n So, when NAI is not an option, sometimes we have developed vaccines to assist the immune system. But, there are more known pathogens that do not have a vaccine than those that do. So, we cannot always depend on vaccines.<\/p>\n Vaccines are usually made by weakening the natural pathogen in the laboratory (attenuation) or inactivating the pathogen. The idea for the vaccine is that there remains enough of the key parts of the pathogenic virus available in the vaccine to jumpstart the immune system enough for it to go into action if the real pathogen is encountered (infection) but not so much that it creates the full disease. But, since we all react differently when confronted with a pathogen, we will all react differently when dealing with a vaccine. After all, a vaccine is only a pathogen surrogate.<\/p>\n The past year has presented a new approach to vaccines, the m-RNA vaccine (messenger-RiboNucleicAcid). This vaccine is a laboratory-created virus using the adenovirus base. That is correct; when you take the m-RNA vaccine, you are taking a man-made virus. This is not an attenuated or inactivated version of the natural virus.<\/p>\n A man-made virus can cause an immune response just like a natural virus. If you suffer from inflammation, fever, or worse after getting the vaccine, you are experiencing vaccine disease. We call those \u201cside effects\u201d only to soften the blow but really, you are experiencing a form of disease. So, there is a new disease that we can call CoVaxED (Coronavirus Vaccine Experienced Disease), in keeping with the 2020 nomenclature.<\/p>\n Further, since the vaccine is meant to mimic the virus, it is possible that you can transmit the vaccine\/virus to others. This has been known with vaccines. The smallpox vaccine was capable of being spread to others from the open sore that was the result of the inoculation of the skin. It was recommended that until the \u201cscab\u201d disappeared, that a person avoid contact with another person. Is this possible with the m-RNA vaccines? Maybe, but it has never been examined in the clinical trials.<\/p>\n There are additional weapons in the arsenal in absence of a vaccine and\/or if NAI is weak. We can use immune boosting agents such as interferon, immunoglobulins, and monoclonal antibodies that will help fight the pathogen and hopefully limit the disease. In some people, it will and some it won\u2019t, all depending on that immunity scale.<\/p>\n We also have therapeutic drugs such as antibiotics, anti-fungal, and antiviral medicines that will go after the offending pathogen or the opportunistic infections that may occur. Other therapeutics may fight the serious effects of disease such as anti-inflammatory drugs (since inflammation is a serious disease response), anti-fever medications, steroidal medications to repair damaged tissues, etc. These may help some sufferers but may not help others.<\/p>\n What is the ace in the hole weapon that each person has? Individual health.<\/p>\n 2. Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI) as a Superior Form of Immunity<\/strong><\/p>\n NAI has been understood for decades but it has existed as long as there have been humans. It is a basic concept in human immunology. Over time, we have learned a lot about how NAI compares to other forms of immunity producing options, such as vaccines.<\/p>\n The following table examines what is known about NAI and vaccines for various common pathogens. This table outlines some of the more common pathogens.<\/p>\n In almost all cases, NAI has been demonstrated to have a much longer immunity expiration period than the vaccine (and these have been the best case scenarios). Rabies is somewhat of an exception since people who experience rabies without a vaccine tend to die. There may have been people who have survived rabies but it is so rare that medical science may have no record of this.<\/p>\n So, we do not know how long immunity might last in a person who survives rabies, if someone were able (I do not want to volunteer for this one). Further, a person who is given the vaccine for rabies because they have been exposed may never be exposed again, so we do not have much data as to how long the vaccine immunity lasts. In domestic animals, the period is assumed to be about one year for vaccination.<\/p>\n The difference between the pathogens that give lifetime NAI and those that do not is due primarily to the type of pathogen. Human-only pathogens that produce little or no variation will give much longer NAI periods. This is one reason why both NAI and vaccines for respiratory infections (primarily influenza) have much more reduced periods. They tend to be mammalian viruses, i.e. viruses that are shared. They also change quickly as they go through populations (variants).<\/p>\n The fact that a virus is shared with many other mammalian species does not necessarily mean that we become infected directly from some species. Just because Coronavirus can be found in cats, for example, does not mean that your cat will infect you with the virus (but, there is no data that can rule it out either). The fact that the virus can infect your cat, however, does give a breeding ground for the virus that can keep it going. The result is that the virus has a much broader base of survival and opportunity to mutate or vary in order to survive (variants). We share respiratory viruses because all mammals share the same respiratory chemistry. We all breathe air to survive.<\/p>\n The following Table illustrates the variant issue quite clearly with respiratory viruses.<\/p>\n 1. nm=nanometer (1000 nm=1 micron). 2. Season of peak occurrence. 3. Human and Mammalian, actual numbers unknown<\/p>\n Although there have been attempts for decades to try and develop vaccines for rhinovirus and Coronavirus, they have not been successful because of the variant issue. We may be witnessing that reality even now with the Coronavirus vaccines.<\/p>\n Influenza vaccines were started in the 1940s. Yet, even today the effectiveness of any influenza vaccine can be predicted as less than 50%.<\/p>\n 3. Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI) may be Dominant on the Planet.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Covid Cult has been trying to ignore or \u201ccancel\u201d NAI and refusing to recognize a very large swath of the world population that has already experienced Coronavirus and Covid. I am not sure if this is directed at trying to force vaccines on populations, although I suspect that is maybe the case in part. By \u201ccanceling\u201d NAI, the brainwashing propaganda is that the only way to get some immunity is from a vaccine (the WHO even edited its website<\/a> to that effect).<\/p>\n\n\n
\n Pathogen Name<\/td>\n NAI Immunity Period<\/td>\n Vaccine Immunity Period<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Variola (Smallpox)<\/td>\n Lifetime<\/td>\n 12-15+ years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Varicella (Chickenpox)<\/td>\n Lifetime<\/td>\n Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Poliomyelitis (Polio)<\/td>\n Lifetime<\/td>\n 1st Dose: 4-5 years 2nd Dose: Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rubeola (Measles)<\/td>\n Lifetime<\/td>\n Long Lasting (but not lifetime)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rubella<\/td>\n Lifetime<\/td>\n 15+ years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rabies<\/td>\n Unknown<\/td>\n Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Influenza<\/td>\n >1 year (depending on variant)<\/td>\n <1 year<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rhinovirus<\/td>\n >1 year (maybe)<\/td>\n NA (No Vaccine)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n \n\n
\n Main URI Viruses and Characteristics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Virus<\/td>\n Size1nm<\/td>\n Family\/Type<\/td>\n Morphology<\/td>\n Known Variants<\/td>\n Seasonality2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Influenza<\/td>\n 80-120<\/td>\n OrthomyxoviridaeNegative Strand RNA<\/td>\n EnvelopedHelical<\/td>\n Types A\/B 1000+<\/td>\n Winter\/Spring<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Coronavirus<\/td>\n 50-120<\/td>\n CoronaviridaePositive Strand RNA<\/td>\n EnvelopedHelical<\/td>\n Alpha\/Beta3 6+?<\/td>\n Winter\/Spring<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rhinovirus<\/td>\n 30-80<\/td>\n PicornaviridaePositive Strand RNA<\/td>\n NakedIcosahedral<\/td>\n 100+<\/td>\n Summar\/Fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n