This World Economic Forum plan is DARK and is already 70% COMPLETE!

World Health Organization Surveillance and the New Smart Wall

• The show discusses the significant surveillance initiatives by the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum, focusing on satellite surveillance for tracking carbon footprints and the implementation of a new smart wall for monitoring individuals entering and exiting the United States.
• Investigative journalist Whitney Webb is invited to provide insights into these surveillance programs and their implications for privacy and sovereignty.

“We’re also going to look at the new smart wall that when you enter exit the United States you’ll be tracked monitored all of that of course this is a world economic forums like wet dream right now so all of this is coming together.”

Carney and the Development of the New Financial System

• Mark Carney, the former head of the Central Bank of England and Canada, is a key figure in developing a new financial system that involves various elements like digital IDs, digital wallets, and carbon markets.
• Entities such as the World Bank are pivotal in creating this new system, emphasizing the importance of reimagining institutions like the World Bank to address climate change.

“Carney, the envoy for climate finance, has been one of the point men for this, and there’s a lot of different factors that are going to feed into this new financial system.”

Green Plus Program and its Affiliations

• The Green Plus program aims to monitor protected areas in Latin America and track carbon emissions through a climate wallet linked to the Bitcoin blockchain.
• The program is associated with the World Bank’s climate action Data Trust and aims to measure ecological footprints from space.

“…specifically focusing for now on monitoring the protected areas of Latin America. They claim to be monitoring your carbon emissions from space…”

Club of Rome and its Controversies

• The Club of Rome, known for its publication “The Limits of Growth,” has ties to influential families like the Rockefellers and has faced criticism for its Neo-Malthusian viewpoints.
• Criticisms of the Club of Rome include accusations of promoting de-industrialization and micromanaging society under the guise of environmentalism.

“…essentially being Neo-Malthusian and definitely not so much interested in saving the planet as they are in micromanaging society.”

Carbon Markets and Financial Systems

• Carbon markets, integral to the new financial system, have faced scrutiny for being over 90% ineffective and prone to fraud.
• Efforts to restore confidence in carbon markets include creating an insurance market, which may perpetuate existing issues rather than address underlying problems.

“Despite their central aspect in the coming financial system, carbon markets have routinely been found to be essentially over 90% worthless.”

Digital ID Agenda and Biometric Requirements for Individuals

• The digital ID agenda, similar to systems in Ukraine and China, is a component of sustainable development goals embraced by most countries to implement biometric requirements for entry and exit.
• The US government is pushing biometric solutions like the “smart wall” to address border issues, integrating biometrics into identification mechanisms.
• Efforts like Florida’s smart ID card, linked to World Economic Forum partners like Thales, aim to replace traditional identification methods with biometric data, such as facial recognition.
• Companies like JP Morgan are exploring biometric integration for financial transactions, promoting the idea of scanning faces instead of using cards for banking activities.
• The broader intent is to transition to a cashless society, with identification tied to biometric data for both physical transactions and online activities.

“The vast majority of countries in the world seem to be moving in lockstep in implementing biometric entry and exit requirements, part of the sustainable development goals embraced globally.”

Transition to Face and Biometric-Based Identification

• The shift towards facial and biometric identification aims for convenience, where personal identification will solely rely on unique biometric features like faces and irises.
• Initiatives such as Worldcoin propose associating biometric scans with unique identifiers, enabling not only real-world identification but also online identity verification.
• Worldcoin’s integration intends to end online anonymity by linking biometric data to online activities, implying a shift towards a society where biometric data is the primary form of identification.

“The idea is to have your identification solely dependent on biometrics like your face and iris, not just for physical transactions but also for online identification purposes.”

Implications of Private Banks on Stablecoins

• Dollar-based stablecoins issued by private commercial banks can be as programmable and surveillable as those issued by the Federal Reserve.
• The private commercial banks, which ultimately control the Federal Reserve, would essentially have the power to issue programmable surveilled money to the public, similar to the Federal Reserve.
• The involvement of banks like JP Morgan and City Group in issuing surveillable stablecoins blurs the line between private sector innovation and the introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
• Concerns arise regarding the control and surveillance of money by private entities, indicating a potential shift towards allowing such entities to influence currency issuance and usage.

“Having JP Morgan and City Group issue stable coins that are programmable and surveillable to the public is essentially introducing central bank digital currencies under a different name.”

Environmental Urgency and Narrative Creation

• The push for implementing plans that frame Earth as collapsing and in imminent danger aims to drive action through fear and urgency.
• The narrative perpetuates the idea that immediate intervention is crucial to prevent catastrophic environmental consequences.
• High-profile figures like President Biden, AOC, and even individuals associated with tech giants like Amazon are actively engaged in initiatives to monitor and mitigate environmental issues under the guise of altruism.
• Billionaires like Jeff Bezos are not only involved in environmental monitoring but are driving Silicon Valley’s interests in areas like transhumanism and technocracy, positioning themselves for greater control and influence in future economic paradigms.

“If we don’t Implement these types of plans, everyone will die… the planet is doomed… they need to keep this narrative going that the Earth is collapsing.”

Silicon Valley’s Role in Environmental and Economic Paradigms

• Silicon Valley billionaires play a significant role in fueling and financing initiatives that align with the UN’s goals and promote public-private partnerships.
• These tech magnates invest in various projects relating to resource mining, environmental monitoring, and market creation, positioning themselves at the forefront of shaping future economic systems.
• Under the pretense of altruism, these billionaires mask their true intentions of securing control and influence in emerging economic landscapes, such as through the promotion of effective altruism as a facade for self-preservation and power consolidation.

“…at the end of the day, a lot of these Silicon Valley billionaires are interested in things like transhumanism, technocracy, and all these different systems… it’s about securing their control and their role in the future in these new economic paradigms.”

Carbon Credit Schemes and Financial Irresponsibility

• Initiatives like using carbon coins and credits to enable quantitative easing introduce risky financial practices under the guise of environmental conservation.
• By tokenizing carbon and leveraging it as a tradable financial asset, entities seek to manage and alleviate the burden of escalating government debt through unconventional means, potentially perpetuating fiscal irresponsibility.
• The implementation of such schemes often disregards the consent of populations, especially in regions like Latin America, imposing financial mechanisms without transparent and ethical considerations.

“Using carbon-based life, tokenizing it so it can become a tradeable financial project… using that to enable insane fiscal irresponsibility… it’s not really altruism at the end of the day, it’s about securing their control and their role in the future…”

Concerns About Government Overreach and Surveillance

• Individuals can find themselves on a watchlist based on metrics like concerns about government overreach.
• There are connections between the same entities involved in satellite technology and the building of the US smart wall.
• The company Anduril, created by Palmer Luckey and Trey Stevens, is a main contractor for the smart wall, developing autonomous weapons for the US military.
• Palmer Luckey aims for completely autonomous warfare without human oversight, a concerning development.
• Surveillance systems used for facial recognition are being repurposed to target and kill individuals in war zones.

“Palmer Luckey is creating autonomous weapons for the US military, aiming for completely autonomous warfare without human oversight.”

Ties Between Contractors and Deep State

• Anduril, along with other companies, acts as contractors for the US military and intelligence agencies.
• There are close ties between these contractors and the deep state, a relationship often criticized by Trump supporters.
• The involvement of former intelligence officer turned Congressman William Hurd in supporting Anduril raises concerns about the influence of the CIA.
• The smart wall project is linked to biometric entry systems in the European Union, framing control as a solution to migration issues.

“Contractors like Anduril are tightly linked to the US military and intelligence agencies, raising concerns about their influence and ties to the deep state.”

The Dark Agenda Behind Digital IDs and Vaccine Passports

• Vaccine passports and digital IDs operate in a similar exclusionary manner, with the primary goal being to restrict people’s freedom of movement.
• Refusing to participate in these systems by not using vaccine passports or digital IDs is a way to resist their control over individuals.
• The narrative of fear, centered around concerns of safety and crime, is used to coax individuals into accepting and complying with these systems.
• The more personal information individuals willingly surrender, the more they contribute to the establishment of a surveillance state.
• The overarching strategy is to instill fear in people to the point where they willingly sacrifice their liberties for a false sense of security.

“They’re building the same total totalitarian surveillance dystopian Nightmare and putting an American flag on it.”

The Deceptive Promotion of a Totalitarian Agenda

• Various entities, including mainstream and independent media, are being utilized to promote the adoption of digital IDs and related surveillance measures.
• Both political parties appear to be aligned in facilitating this surveillance agenda, which is part of the Sustainable Development Agenda.
• The Sustainable Development Agenda, purportedly for global benefit, is, in reality, a tool for bankers to deepen control over the world population through debt and surveillance.
• The manipulation of fear, media censorship, and centralized control are tactics employed to ensure compliance with this overarching agenda.
• The ultimate goal is a global surveillance system that extends into financial and societal structures, necessitating a unified resistance by individuals against compliance and fear-mongering strategies.

“Ultimately, this is truly a Global agenda with a global surveillance component… and the way to oppose it is to not comply and not give into the fear.”

The WEF Plan Progresses Despite Concerns

• The treaty under discussion is acknowledged as a power grab, though with some improvements that signal progress.
• Despite noted concessions, the primary objective remains obtaining substantial power, putting nations on alert.
• The revised document seeks to avoid overt sovereignty overreach but still aims to consolidate authority.

“I’m still not going to call this a win, I’m going to call it progress because at least [WHO knew that] we were hip to their plan to usurp sovereignty…”

Alarming WHO Document Details

• Initial fears related to a WHO document centered on granting extensive powers for pandemic measures, including implementing lockdowns, vaccines, and censorship.
• The WHO could unilaterally declare various activities, like agriculture practices, as pandemic risks.
• Key concerns also revolved around the WHO’s ability to label any situation a pandemic risk, granting unchecked power.

“The WHO was trying to pass that would give them the power to implement pandemic measures such as lockdowns, vaccines… and mandate population censorship and surveillance…”

Critique of the WHO’s Role and Influence

• The WHO’s questionable history and behaviors, such as the Congo scandal, raise doubts about the organization’s integrity.
• Despite past mishandlings and lack of accountability, the WHO continues to hold significant influence, impacting global policies.
• The WHO’s reliance on outdated or disproven information further erodes trust in its decision-making authority.

“The WHO sucks, they should not be given any other power inside of any government or business…”

Implications of Revised WHO Plan

• The revised WHO plan excludes binding language, offering some relief, yet exit strategies remain challenging to secure.
• The document emphasizes global collaboration on pandemic management while retaining significant authority for the WHO.
• The WHO’s granted power to determine what poses a pandemic risk extends to environmental, social, and economic factors, potentially impacting diverse sectors.

“So, they could again decide that livestock farming is a risk or any other food farm or a business is a climate change exacerbator…”

WHO’s Potential Imposition of Laws

• The discussion revolves around the implications of a clause in the treaty that could allow the WHO to impose emergency regulations that supersede local laws.
• Employees of a company are pondering the treaty’s clauses related to potential intrusion into national legal frameworks.
• The treaty text suggests enforcing frameworks for rapid regulatory approvals during emergencies and against health-related issues.

This says to me they want to make sure they have the right to implement whatever they want, and that there should not be any local laws that stop them.

Concerns about WHO’s Influence Through Education and Research

• The video expresses apprehensions regarding the WHO’s intention to promote specific knowledge through education and fund research to understand and possibly influence public health and social measures compliance.
• The WHO’s language around enhancing literacy and understanding of pandemics suggests a focus on shaping public opinion and behavior.
• It is interpreted as a push towards indoctrination and potential propaganda dissemination, particularly targeting school-aged children.

They want to educate you in a specific manner, inform policies based on research findings about public health and social measures adherence, and potentially target schools for messaging.

Financial Implications and Binding Nature of the Treaty

• The dialogue shifts to how countries’ budgets will be evaluated and decisions made by the WHO regarding the financial commitments each nation must adhere to.
• Comparisons are drawn to a dining experience where the customer entrusts the chef to decide the menu, hinting at a lack of control over financial obligations after aligning with the treaty.
• The exploration of national budgets and the determination of subscription costs can have significant fiscal implications for nations.

They will look into your country’s budget, decide on relevant fees, and your nation’s financial commitment will be dictated by the WHO, akin to a dining experience where the chef decides your bill.

Enforced Commitment Period and Withdrawal Restrictions

• Details are outlined regarding the binding nature of the treaty, emphasizing that nations are committed for at least three years post-ratification, with constraints on premature withdrawal.
• The withdrawal process is likened to gym memberships, where a contractual period must be fulfilled regardless of the desire to exit.
• Specific timeframes and processes are highlighted, showing that exiting the treaty can involve a prolonged timeline even after initiating the withdrawal.

Countries are obliged to remain in the treaty for a minimum of three years following acceptance, akin to being locked into a gym contract without the ability to easily exit at will.

Possible Ploy Behind Treaty Edits

• Suggests edits may aim to lure opposing countries into agreement for the treaty.
• Speculates if adjustments are made to appease critics and increase acceptance.

All of these edits are they a ploy to get countries that are against this to buy into it.

Opposition to the Treaty

• Mentions leaders against the pandemic treaty, like Slovakia’s Prime Minister and New Zealand’s Deputy Prime Minister.
• Notes massive peaceful rallies opposing the World Health Organization (WHO).

Slovakia will absolutely not be signing any pandemic treaty. New Deputy Prime Minister Ron Winston Peters has also spoken out against the WHO.

Trudea’s Alleged Fear of Criticism

• Discusses how Canadian PM Trudeau allegedly labels critics of his policies, such as the carbon tax, as extremists.
• Implies fear of criticism and exposure of globalist schemes.

Well, Justin Trudeau appears to be terrified of Alex Jones… is it the awareness about his globalist scheme that Alex and others have been exposing that terrifies him?

Critique of Trudeau’s Response

• Criticism of Trudeau disregarding the actual critique of carbon-centric climate policies.
• Observes Trudeau’s strategy of labeling opposition as extremists to deflect criticism.

What was hilarious about all of this is that you get to attack Alex Jones, Pierre PV, but what he does by attacking those individuals is obfuscating the real extremist position here.

Trudeau’s Unpopular Carbon Tax Criticism

• Trudeau faces ongoing protests against his carbon tax increase, emphasizing a 23% rise on April 1st. These protests reveal widespread discontent among Canadians, particularly with the tax’s impact on their daily lives and financial strain, yet Trudeau deflects this criticism.
• “To call these people extremists… true is refusing to address the unpopularity of his carbon tax.”
• “Trudeau refuses to acknowledge the pain of Canadians… it isn’t even achieving the results that he claims it’s achieving.”

Trudeau’s narrative on the carbon tax fails to resonate with the public, dismissing valid criticism and refusing to acknowledge the hardships Canadians face.

Opposition to Climate Change Narrative

• Trudeau tends to divert discussions about issues like the carbon tax to climate change or Ukraine, deflecting from the core concerns raised by the public.
• The attempt to associate dissenters with extremism and fringe groups like Diagon is a strategic move to delegitimize valid protests against the carbon tax.

Trudeau sidesteps criticism by shifting the conversation towards climate change or unrelated topics, dismissing genuine concerns.

Globalist Cabal Meeting: The “Summit of the Future”

• The upcoming United Nations meeting, known as the Summit of the Future, is set to declare a planetary emergency, giving rise to concerns about a technocratic takeover.
• This meeting is part of a broader trend towards establishing global governance, with organizations like the World Economic Forum, United Nations, Club of Rome, and others working towards a world government.
• The Summit of the Future, scheduled for September 22nd-23rd in New York City, aims to redefine the UN with discussions dating back to the early days of the pandemic in 2020.

“They’re giving themselves Powers so that in the case of some new claimed pandemic, they could declare an emergency and give themselves all kinds of fund Powers.”

Planetary Emergency and Global Governance

• The idea of planetary sovereignty is being pushed where national borders are seen as less relevant, and a global community approach is promoted to handle crises like climate change and pandemics.
• The concept of a “poly crisis” involves facing multiple crises simultaneously, advocating for stronger international systems and potentially moving beyond the UN’s governance models.
• Discussions around a potential “Pact for the Future” aim to rally countries to recommit to sustainable development goals and the great reset, potentially reshaping global governance.
• Globalists see the need to transcend national borders in favor of a global outlook, aligning with the agenda for a summit that could lead to significant steps towards global governance.

“We are facing a poly crisis, multiple crisis at once…we need stronger International Global Systems to be able to better handle this.”

Dark Agenda of the World Economic Forum’s Origins and Philosophy

• The Club of Rome and its concept of overpopulation have influenced the World Economic Forum since its inception, with figures like Henry Kissinger mentoring its leader, Klaus Schwab.
• A pivotal moment was the Club of Rome’s report, “The Limits to Growth,” which marked humanity as the enemy and called for population reduction, aligning with a eugenics agenda.
• This narrative frames reducing carbon emissions and the 2030 Net Zero plan as part of a dark eugenics agenda.
• The Club of Rome has persistently advocated declaring a planetary emergency, building up to initiatives like the 2019 “Planetary Emergency Plan,” setting the stage for global transformation plans and power consolidation.

“Humanity should be used as the enemy… promoting the idea that humanity is the problem… at the heart of it, it is a eugenesis agenda… part of this pack for the future.”

Globalist Plans for Power and Resistance

• Globalists aim to consolidate power through rebranded initiatives like the “Pack for the Future,” emphasizing inclusivity and sustainability while pushing for more influence.
• Developing nations are being courted to join, despite some resistance shown by countries like Brazil and African nations.
• Public opposition and increased awareness, fueled by platforms like this broadcast and independent journalism, are challenging the mainstream narrative and globalist efforts.
• The acceleration of censorship and misinformation campaigns suggests a sense of urgency as the 2030 Agenda for transformation progresses.

“This absolutely is happening… there’s more resistance than there probably ever has been… we’re in the middle of this attempted transformation… it’s happening in public because there is resistance.”

Empowering a Grassroots Response to Globalist Agendas

• Individuals and communities are encouraged to resist passivity by engaging in protests, sharing information, and creating alternative systems.
• The call is to envision and collaboratively build a counter-vision for the future, distinct from the globalist agenda, which threatens personal freedoms and privacy.
• By spreading awareness, connecting with like-minded individuals, and actively shaping a desired future, people can counteract the oppressive narrative and safeguard individual liberties.

“We need to keep spreading awareness… connect with other people interested in these ideas… we need to keep spreading awareness as much as possible.”

Globalist Takedown

• The episode is focused on unraveling the globalist agenda and covering stories not commonly seen in mainstream media.
• The hosts express gratitude to the audience for supporting democracy, freedom, and liberty through their coverage.