Originally published by Childrenshealthdefense.org.
A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
They almost certainly also passed the Delta infection to susceptible unvaccinated people, including their patients. Sequencing of strains confirmed the workers transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to one another.
This is consistent with the observations in the U.S. from Farinholt and colleagues, and congruent with comments by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conceding COVID-19 vaccines have failed to stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
On Feb. 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.
Thus, we have a key piece to the puzzle explaining why the Delta outbreak is so formidable — fully vaccinated are participating as COVID-19 patients and acting as powerful Typhoid Mary-style super-spreaders of the infection.
Vaccinated individuals are blasting out concentrated viral explosions into their communities and fueling new COVID surges. Vaccinated healthcare workers are almost certainly infecting their coworkers and patients, causing horrendous collateral damage.
Continued vaccination will only make this problem worse, particularly among frontline doctors and nurses workers who are caring for vulnerable patients.
Health systems should drop vaccine mandates immediately, take stock of COVID-19 recovered workers who are robustly immune to Delta and consider the ramifications of their current vaccinated healthcare workers as potential threats to high risk patients and coworkers.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
This post was originally published by Childrenshealthdefense.org.
Author: Children’s Health Defense
The mission of Children’s Health Defense is to end childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and to establish safeguards so this never happens again. CHD was founded by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and he serves as Chairman. For over three decades, he has been one of the world’s leading advocates of humanitarian and environmental causes. He is also founder and president of Waterkeeper Alliance, the umbrella group for 300 local waterkeeper organizations, in 34 countries, that track down and sue polluters. His father, Robert F. Kennedy, served as United States Attorney General (1961-1964) and United States Senator from New York (1965-1968).
The Variant of Concern Technical Report published by the UK Health Ministry on the 25 of June shows very clearly that the infection /fatality for those who had both doses of the vaccine was nearly 9 times higher than un-vaccinated.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001354/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf
There’s nothing wrong with having questions about the vaccine, but this information is inaccurate. Please go to the source, which is actually linked in the original childrens health defense article!
If you read the actual paper, it says the viral loads in infected people of the DELTA variant are 251X higher than the viral loads of the PREVIOUS variants. It is not comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. The whole premise of this discussion using the paper is not correct. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733
The paper says, “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
The conclusion of the paper is instead ” Interpretation: Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission.”
That vaccinated people who are symptomatic with delta variant carry the SAME or SIMILAR viral loads as infected nonvaccinated with delta variant people has been known for a few months. Simply stated, the higher your viral load, the more likely you are to have symptoms and the sicker you may get, regardless of vaccination status. If you want to know the statistics for severe disease and hospitalization comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated, that is available and I’m not here to argue that. Sterilizing immunity initially found in the vaccination studies of previous variants was a bonus – the vaccines were developed to protect against severe disease and all the hype about immunity has actually caused a lot of harm.
No matter your opinion on any of this highly politicized subject, what will probably happen over the next year is that this will become endemic. The highly transmitted delta variant will cause this to happen more quickly. As vaccinated people develop the long-term memory cell immunity and previously-infected people do the same, (or some combination of both) each exposure will result in the next exposure being either repelled by the immune system, or lesser in severity until COVID truly is just another corona virus like the cold that we have to deal with seasonally. If you choose to get your exposure through infection and not vaccination, you are just accepting a greater risk of severe disease – that is the choice you make and there are, of course, other ramificiations. If only people could have rational discussions about this and not be stuck in one corner or another over this divisive tribalism, we could all work together.
There are four other corona viruses that are now endemic for which this is the case. That happens over time – kind of like how cold and flu viruses decimated some isolated native populations when explorers who had developed immunity over many years first visited.
I appreciate your point KO but disagree with your conclusion based on the same sentence you quoted, “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
As stated, participants in this study are called “breakthrough” infections because they were all injected with the covid serum. Their viral loads were compared with people who were infected between March-April 2020, which was prior to the development of the serum, so 100% of those people were serum free. So this study truly compares jabbed vs unjabbed and the statements shared by CHD are 100% accurate.
Since neither the covid virus nor any variations of it have ever been isolated, any claims about a Delta variant is based on theory without any supporting scientific evidence. Many experts on this topic, including Dr David Martin, have concluded the Delta variant is a lame cover story attempting to explain why the serum provides zero protection from infection. So-called breakthrough cases, which are growing daily all around the world, prove this point and to make matters worse, this study proves the serum makes recipients much worse off with a viral load 251 times greater than those who had no serum. This is bad news for those who took the serum, but it’s in addition to lots of other bad news that is being censored by the mainstream media, including tens of thousands dead and millions injured, and that’s based on reported cases, which have been proven to be way lower than actual cases. Beyond that, many have reported their body is now magnetic, as documented in many video testimonies. And the long term effect on their immune system remains unknown since no long term studies were done.
KO
“Breakthrough” in medical terms refers a person who’s infected despite being vaccinated. You can even google that. The paper’s interpretation is damning towards the effectiveness of the vaccines.
Regardless, based on studies like this, one can effectively question the need for a vaccine. If viral loads are the same regardless of being vaccinated, why the constant need to push for mass vaccination?
If this was a genuine misunderstanding and naivety in the medical world, one could forgive the constant prodding. But statistics and recent research is there for all to see, yet majority of the people, especially governments and community leaders refuse to acknowledge the blatantly obvious.
Common sense and reasoning leads one to believe this is about much more than just another novel virus.
When research shows you that a 8 month old vaccine is basically redundant, you don’t go looking for the positives regardless of how slim it may be. You reject that poison and never entertain the thought of putting it in your body.
K O,
I disagree with your statement that unvaccinated are at greater risk of severe disease.
If you look at the statistics, you are going to see that the percentage of vaccinated and unvaccinated that test positive and end up visiting emergency care is the same. In the UK this is roughly 1 in 200 of confirmed positive cases for both groups. While the absolute number is 7x higher in the unvaccinated, at the rapid rate of spread, it’s safe to assume that it is inevitable for this trend to continue for the vaccinated as well. Even if it takes more time to ramp up.
But when you look at the confirmed positive cases leading to death, attributed to delta, it seems that the vaccinated are dying at a higher rate. Why? One explanation could be that a higher percentage of risk groups belong in the vaccinated. This theory however does not explain why hospitalization rates are the same.
Based on these numbers alone, it’s fairly straightforward to come to a conclusion that vaccines do absolutely nothing to prevent hospitalization or anything they claim they do. They might slow down the rate of infection at best, but possibly at the cost of a more devastating end result. Plus all the possible adverse reactions. For the majority, these shots are all risk and no benefit.
Those who thinks that the vaccines are highly efficient and that they make a mild flu even milder, well.. They don’t really have any scientific comparison point. It’s just a matter of faith and what they believe in.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001358/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_18.pdf
“breakthrough cases” MEANS cases in vaccinated people.
From the article:
“Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020″
In March-April 2020 vaccines were not available. The article IS comparing vaccinated to un-vaccinated people.